GeoAI & deep learning on imagery
Feature extraction, building and road detection, land cover classification and change detection – trained and validated on your own imagery, not a benchmark dataset.
Home / AI & Innovation
AI work that starts with an evaluation plan rather than a demo – including GeoAI, where the training data is imagery and the ground truth is a survey.
It takes very little to produce something impressive in a workshop. What separates that from a system you can put in front of customers, auditors or a regulator is evaluation, data lineage, oversight design and an operating model.
We work the unglamorous half first. Before writing a line of model code we agree what “good” means numerically, how it will be measured, on which held-out data, and what result would cause us to recommend stopping.
What action changes because of this system, and what error would it be unacceptable to make?
Held-out, representative, and agreed with you before modelling begins.
Often a simple rule or existing process. A model that cannot beat it does not ship.
Robustness, bias, drift and failure modes – documented, not assumed away.
Your team inherits the evaluation suite, not just the model.
Feature extraction, building and road detection, land cover classification and change detection – trained and validated on your own imagery, not a benchmark dataset.
An honest assessment of where AI would pay for itself and where it would not – scored against data availability, process maturity and regulatory exposure.
Problem framing, feature and data design, model development and rigorous evaluation. We publish the evaluation protocol before we report the numbers.
Retrieval architectures, prompt and tool design, grounding strategy, evaluation harnesses and the cost model – built to survive a model change.
Inspection, monitoring and detection systems for industrial and environmental settings, including edge deployment and drift monitoring.
Risk classification, model documentation, bias and robustness testing, human-oversight design and audit trails a regulator would accept.
Every AI engagement carries an assurance workstream from day one. These are the artefacts you get, whether or not you asked for them.
Purpose, training data provenance, known limits and out-of-scope uses, written for a non-specialist reader.
The test sets, metrics, thresholds and results – including the cases where performance was poor.
Where a person must be in the loop, what they see, and what authority they have to override.
What is watched in production, at what cadence, and the trigger conditions for retraining or rollback.
Tell us what you are trying to find out. We come back within two working days with an honest view of whether we can help, how long it would take and what it would cost – before you commit to anything.